Compare laser cutting with mechanical cutting. It analyzes the differences in the cutting action, surface finish, and compatibility with the material. Know the strengths of laser cutting over mechanical cutting in regards to precision, speed, and adaptability.
Lasercutting does not require any contact, meaning there is no interaction between the workpiece and the cutting tool. As a result, issues of tool wear and damage to the material surface are greatly reduced. Tools used in mechanical cutting like buzz or punches have a tendency to wear out quickly, as well as cause destruction to the material they come into contact with.
Suitable for Delicate Materials
Because of the non contact nature as well as the controllable energy input, laser cutting is ideal for delicate cutting. For instance, it can cut delicate thin films , sensitive heating plastic or brittle materials without damaging them. Such delicate materials are likely to break or get damaged during a cutting process if handled by mechanical cutting techniques.
When comparing laser cutting to mechanical cutting, it's clear laser cutting has a more positive edge. First, it is a non-contact method that minimizes inflicting wear on the tools and the material surface. As an additional bonus, laser cutting has a fast speed and high precision for patterns and complex shapes. It is clear that mechanical cutting imposes greater challenges with its lower cutting speed and its higher likelihood of inflicting vibrations and noise. Because of its precision and efficiency, laser cutting is best suited for modern manufacturing.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the advantages of laser cutting over mechanical cutting?
Machines that perform laser cutting do not need to create physical contact with the object being cut, meaning the tools will not undergo wear and tear while the object’s protective surface will have no damage. Aside from increased surface protection, parts can be made out of intricate designs, as they are cut quickly and accurately. In addition, laser cutting machines make less noise while using less force, meaning more fragile materials can be worked with. The same cannot be said for mechanical cutting, as having greater material deformation happens as well as greater degradation in precision, all needing more maintenance.
When is mechanical cutting a better choice than laser cutting?
In some cases, specifically with the cutting soft and thick materials, mechanical cutting takes the advantage because overheating of the materials can create issues. Additionally, It would also be more economical for large and simple cuts. For lower levels of precision, mechanical cutting is much more affordable and practical compared to other methods.
Related Articles
08
Jan
Understanding the Benefits of 4-Roll Plate Rolling Machines
Throughout multiple domains of industry, “Laser cutting” has exhibited unmatched advantages relative to “Mechanical cutting”. The process is quicker, more accurate, and it increases the efficiency of material utilization. Additionally, intricate shapes and patterns can be easily handled with laser cutting. Simple tasks might be done using mechanical cutting, but for the great majority of our work, laser cutting achieves greater results and more productivity.
Laser cutting is a non-contact method, meaning that no tool touches the material, and as such tool wear is eliminated. Saw Mechanical cuts saws and blades cut through things, which over time dulls them. Laser cutting, however, is far more efficient because it can sustain productive runs for a long time and maintain impeccable cut quality without replacing tools often.
Complex Shape Cutting Ease
Laser cutting allows for the cutting of very intricate shapes that would otherwise be impossible or very tough to mechanically cut. The machine has a laser beam which can move throughout the intricate patterns that have been etched onto its path, allowing numerous curves, patterns, and holes to be made. In comparison, mechanical cutting is usually restricted by the form and dimension of the cutting instrument, which are not very precise tools for complex geometries.
EN
AR
CS
FR
DE
PL
PT
RU
ES
TL
ID
UK
VI
TH
FA
MS
